New Delhi: The Union authorities issued over 3,417 orders to dam Twitter URLs in 2022 – up from a mere eight instances in 2014, when the Narendra Modi-led authorities got here to energy, information accessed by way of Proper to Data (RTI) requests confirmed.

This development, in line with RTI activist Venkatesh Nayak, who obtained the info, signifies both a rise within the abuse of such platforms or rising “sensitivity of the Union authorities in direction of the views and opinions which aren’t consistent with its personal considering” or each.

Earlier, the Ministry of Data and Broadcasting’s central public data officer (CPIO) had rejected a request to publish the proceedings of the inter-departmental committee which points instructions to dam content material on social and digital media platforms beneath the IT Guidelines, 2021.

The CPIO claimed ‘confidentiality’ for the proceedings of the overview committee and rejected a request to publish them beneath the RTI Act, 2005. Nonetheless, after a delay of 40 days, the Ministry of Electronics and Data Expertise’s CPIO responded to among the queries.

It mentioned that the committee constituted beneath Rule 7 to look at requests/complaints for blocking entry to data met 39 instances in 2021 and 53 instances in 2022.

Consultant picture. Photograph: greenwish/Pexels

A manifold enhance in blocking orders

An evaluation of the RTI information confirmed that MeitY had issued 1,385 blocking orders to Twitter and different social and digital media platforms in 2017, which elevated to 9,849 orders in 2020 – the 12 months the COVID-19 pandemic started.

Nayak had filed a number of RTI functions with MeitY and the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha secretariats on the problem.

“In 2021, orders for blocking Twitter URLs have been issued in 2,851 circumstances, and in 1,122 circumstances as much as June 2022,” he mentioned whereas analysing the figures tabled by MeitY within the Lok Sabha on July 27, 2022 and Rajya Sabha on July 29, 2022.

In line with the info tabled within the Rajya Sabha on March 25, 2022, MeitY mentioned {that a} whole of 6,096 URLs (Twitter and others) have been directed to be blocked in 2021. As of the date of reply, 1,264 blocking orders have been issued in 2022.

Between January 1, 2021 and December 31, 2022, the committee constituted beneath Rule 7 issued a complete of 6,268 blocking orders of Twitter URLs, the RTI report mentioned.

Due to this fact, Nayak mentioned, in 2021, in line with the info tabled in parliament, 2,851 Twitter URLs have been directed to be blocked. So in 2022, the variety of Twitter URLs blocked will likely be 3,417 (i.e., 6,268 minus 2,851). It is a 19.85% enhance from the 2021 figures.

The report mentioned {that a} whole variety of 6,096 URLs have been blocked in 2021 and 6,775 in 2022 which included all sorts of URLs resembling webpages, web sites, particular pages on social media platforms, and so forth.

So, as per Nayak’s evaluation, in 2021, social and digital media content material on platforms apart from Twitter was blocked in 3,245 circumstances (i.e., 6,096 minus 2,851). And, in 2022, this determine was 3,358 (i.e., 6,775 minus 3,417). It is a 3.48% enhance within the variety of blocking orders from 2021.

Watch | Blocking BBC’s 2002 Riot Documentary ‘Unacceptable Censorship’ by Authorities: N. Ram

The process adopted for issuing blocking orders

On the process adopted for blocking content material, the CPIO mentioned, in response to the RTI queries, that every one suggestions made by the committee in 2021 and 2022 for blocking public entry to data have been put up for the approval of the secretary, MeitY, and his approval was obtained, on file, for all of them. The CPIO additionally replied that MeitY doesn’t keep date-wise details about these issues.

In line with Nayak, MeitY refused to share the supplies positioned earlier than the mentioned committee. It additionally refused to share data on the committee’s proceedings, and in addition these [materials] of the committee which critiques such instructions, citing a ‘confidentiality’ clause within the Data Expertise (Procedures and Safeguards for Blocking for Entry of Data by Public) Guidelines, 2009 (2009 Blocking Guidelines).

He added that claiming a fiduciary relationship, MeitY additionally refused to publicly disclose the papers referring to a case by which the blocking orders in opposition to some tweets is presently being heard by the Karnataka excessive courtroom, behind closed doorways. On this regard, the CPIO’s response on January 24 mentioned: “[The] Ministry of Electronics and Data Expertise has a fiduciary relationship therefore the requested data can’t be shared.”

Blocking Guidelines have been tabled, however not chosen by the Home panel for scrutiny

Nayak had additionally requested the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha secretariats concerning the standing of the 2009 Blocking Guidelines which have been tabled in each Homes of parliament as required beneath Part 87(3) of the IT Act.

“The 2009 Blocking Guidelines have been tabled in each Homes of parliament as required beneath Part 87(3) of the IT Act. Nonetheless, the CPIOs of the secretariats of each Homes of parliament said that the Guidelines have been by no means taken up by the respective Committees on Subordinate Laws for detailed scrutiny,” the RTI findings confirmed.

On this regard, the Lok Sabha Secretariat mentioned that “the Data Expertise (Process for Safeguards for Blocking for Entry of Data by Public) Guidelines, 2009 printed in Notification No. G.S.R. 781(E) in Gazette of India dated twenty seventh October, 2009, was laid on the Desk of Lok Sabha on 14.12.2009.”

It added that “the Committee on Subordinate Laws of the Lok Sabha didn’t choose the Data Expertise (Process for Safeguards for Blocking for Entry of Data by Public) Guidelines, 2009 for scrutiny” and that “no report was drafted and introduced by the Committee on the mentioned Guidelines.”

Curiously, the secretariat mentioned it couldn’t hint the date of laying of the notification and added that “it appears that evidently the involved Ministry, i.e. the Ministry of Electronics and Data Expertise, haven’t forwarded the mentioned notification for laying on the Desk of the Home inside a interval of 15 days of its publication within the official gazette.”